Case Study Critical Analysis

We have elected to utilize thisextended transition period. Our economic statements may therefore not be similar to those of companies that conform to suchnew or revised accounting criteria as they become applicable to public businesses. We cannot expect if investors will find ourcommon stock less appealing because we shall depend on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractiveas a result, there may be a less active trading marketplace for our common stock and our stock price may be more volatile. We could remain an emerginggrowth company for up to 5 years, or until case study answer earliest of i case study solution last day of case study answer first fiscal year in whichour annual gross income exceed $1 billion, ii case study solution date that we become a large speeded up fileras described in Rule 12b 2 under case study solution Exchange Act, which might occur if case study answer market value of our common stock that is held by non affiliatesexceeds $700 million as of case study answer last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter or iii case study answer date on whichwe have issued greater than $1 billion in non convertible debt during case study answer previous three year period. We have not conducted anevaluation of our inner manage over economic reporting, such as required by Section 404 of case study solution Sarbanes Oxley Act, nor havewe engaged our independent registered public accounting firm to carry out an audit of our inner handle over economic reportingas of any balance sheet date or for any period mentioned in our financial statements.